· API Primer Team · Architecture  · 2 min read

REST vs. GraphQL vs. gRPC - Choosing the Right Protocol

One size does not fit all. We compare the three titans of API protocols to help you decide which one fits your next project's needs.

One size does not fit all. We compare the three titans of API protocols to help you decide which one fits your next project's needs.

The Paradox of Choice

In the early days, we had SOAP. Then REST took over the world. Now, we have powerful alternatives like GraphQL and gRPC. Which one should you choose? The answer, as always, is: it depends.

1. REST (Representational State Transfer)

The Standard. REST is built on top of standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE).

  • Pros:
    • Universally understood: Every developer knows it.
    • Cacheable: Leverages HTTP caching mechanisms effectively.
    • Stateless: Great for horizontal scaling.
  • Cons:
    • Over-fetching/Under-fetching: You might get more data than you need, or have to make multiple calls to get what you want.
  • Best For: Public APIs, simple microservices, resource-oriented applications.

2. GraphQL

The Query Language. Developed by Facebook, GraphQL allows clients to ask for exactly what they need.

  • Pros:
    • No Over-fetching: Get exactly the fields you asked for.
    • Single Endpoint: No need to manage versioned URLs.
    • Strongly Typed: Schema serves as a contract.
  • Cons:
    • Complexity: Harder to implement and secure (complexity attacks).
    • Caching: HTTP caching is harder because everything is a POST.
  • Best For: Mobile apps (bandwidth constraints), complex front-ends with highly relational data.

3. gRPC (Google Remote Procedure Call)

The Speed Demon. Built on HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers (Protobuf).

  • Pros:
    • Performance: Binary serialization is much faster and smaller than JSON.
    • Streaming: Native support for bi-directional streaming.
    • Code Generation: Auto-generate client and server code in multiple languages.
  • Cons:
    • Browser Support: Requires a proxy (gRPC-Web) to work in browsers.
    • Debuggability: Binary data is not human-readable like JSON.
  • Best For: Internal microservices communication, real-time streaming, low-latency systems.

Summary Table

FeatureRESTGraphQLgRPC
Data FormatJSON (usually)JSONProtobuf (Binary)
TransportHTTP/1.1 or 2HTTP/1.1 or 2HTTP/2
CouplingLooseLooseTight (Contract)
Use CasePublic APIsFlexible Front-endsInternal Services

Final Verdict

  • Building a public API for 3rd party developers? Stick to REST.
  • Building a complex dashboard or mobile app? GraphQL might be your friend.
  • Building high-performance microservices that talk to each other? gRPC is the winner.
Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »
What is an AI Gateway?

What is an AI Gateway?

As LLMs become integral to applications, managing their traffic becomes critical. Learn how AI Gateways provide control, visibility, and cost management for your AI integrations.

API Security Essentials - The OWASP Top 10

API Security Essentials - The OWASP Top 10

APIs are the front door to your data. Make sure you lock it. A breakdown of the most critical API security risks and how to mitigate them using the OWASP Top 10 framework.

How to do orchestration in Kong

How to do orchestration in Kong

One of the much awaited feature in Kong which was released in 3.10 is the Request Callout, which will help the Kong API management platform to perform orchestration/aggregation of API calls instead of teams exploring custom plugins

Using Gateway API with Kong

Using Gateway API with Kong

Kubernetes has revolutionized how we deploy and manage applications. This blog post will delve into the methods of exposing pods in Kubernetes, the existing Ingress API, its limitations, and why the Kubernetes SIG (Special Interest Group) is developing the new Gateway API as its successor. We'll also walk through how to deploy the Gateway API using Kong