· API Primer Team · Architecture · 2 min read
REST vs. GraphQL vs. gRPC - Choosing the Right Protocol
One size does not fit all. We compare the three titans of API protocols to help you decide which one fits your next project's needs.
The Paradox of Choice
In the early days, we had SOAP. Then REST took over the world. Now, we have powerful alternatives like GraphQL and gRPC. Which one should you choose? The answer, as always, is: it depends.
1. REST (Representational State Transfer)
The Standard. REST is built on top of standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE).
- Pros:
- Universally understood: Every developer knows it.
- Cacheable: Leverages HTTP caching mechanisms effectively.
- Stateless: Great for horizontal scaling.
- Cons:
- Over-fetching/Under-fetching: You might get more data than you need, or have to make multiple calls to get what you want.
- Best For: Public APIs, simple microservices, resource-oriented applications.
2. GraphQL
The Query Language. Developed by Facebook, GraphQL allows clients to ask for exactly what they need.
- Pros:
- No Over-fetching: Get exactly the fields you asked for.
- Single Endpoint: No need to manage versioned URLs.
- Strongly Typed: Schema serves as a contract.
- Cons:
- Complexity: Harder to implement and secure (complexity attacks).
- Caching: HTTP caching is harder because everything is a POST.
- Best For: Mobile apps (bandwidth constraints), complex front-ends with highly relational data.
3. gRPC (Google Remote Procedure Call)
The Speed Demon. Built on HTTP/2 and Protocol Buffers (Protobuf).
- Pros:
- Performance: Binary serialization is much faster and smaller than JSON.
- Streaming: Native support for bi-directional streaming.
- Code Generation: Auto-generate client and server code in multiple languages.
- Cons:
- Browser Support: Requires a proxy (gRPC-Web) to work in browsers.
- Debuggability: Binary data is not human-readable like JSON.
- Best For: Internal microservices communication, real-time streaming, low-latency systems.
Summary Table
| Feature | REST | GraphQL | gRPC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Format | JSON (usually) | JSON | Protobuf (Binary) |
| Transport | HTTP/1.1 or 2 | HTTP/1.1 or 2 | HTTP/2 |
| Coupling | Loose | Loose | Tight (Contract) |
| Use Case | Public APIs | Flexible Front-ends | Internal Services |
Final Verdict
- Building a public API for 3rd party developers? Stick to REST.
- Building a complex dashboard or mobile app? GraphQL might be your friend.
- Building high-performance microservices that talk to each other? gRPC is the winner.

